The two major Anne Frank organizations in Europe have their domicile in Amsterdam and Basel.
In Amsterdam, the "Anne Frank Stichting" only has authority over the house where she was hidden, and has little connection to the Jewish community.
In Amsterdam, the "Anne Frank Stichting" only has authority over the house where she was hidden, and has little connection to the Jewish community.
It is an
NGO that markets Anne Frank and the Holocaust as a general warning against discrimination, racism and bigotry in modern society.
They spend
their profit on projects against discrimination.
The "Anne Frank Fonds" in Basel has the intellectual
copyright for her diary. It was set up by Otto Frank and is run by Jews.
They spend
their profit on left-wing Jewish things.
The two
Anne Frank organizations do not get on well with each other.
The Basel Anne Frank sees all Jews as the “descendants” of Anne Frank, because she was
Jewish and the victim of antisemitism.
The Amsterdam
Anne Frank is not so categorical, as it emphasizes the story of Anne Frank as a general warning against prejudice and discrimination.
Therefore, all who suffer from prejudice and discrimination are her "descendants".
Therefore, all who suffer from prejudice and discrimination are her "descendants".
This
goes some way to supporting the left-wing misappropriation of the legacy of
Anne Frank and the Holocaust.
The
left-wing misappropriation does not deny the Holocaust.
Far from
it, it emphasizes that the Jews who were killed were the victims of a terrible
slaughter caused by discrimination, racism and bigotry.
Essential
is the emphasis placed on Jews being victims in the past.
According
to the misappropriation, today’s live Jews, the Zionists, are not victims. They are the
oppressors; perpetrators of indiscriminate killing of innocents. The modern equivalent of the Nazis.
Therefore,
the victims of today's live Jews are the real descendants of Anne Frank and the Jews
killed in the Holocaust.
For
these people, Palestinians like Ahed Tamimi are modern-day Anne Franks.
Wait a minute, you may say, many of these "modern-day" Anne Franks have the same hatred of Jews as the Nazis who killed the original Anne Frank. They even use the same language.
The misappropriation will reply that this is the fault of the live Jews themselves. If they had not oppressed the Muslims, the Muslims would not want to slaughter them.
Wait a minute, you may say, many of these "modern-day" Anne Franks have the same hatred of Jews as the Nazis who killed the original Anne Frank. They even use the same language.
The misappropriation will reply that this is the fault of the live Jews themselves. If they had not oppressed the Muslims, the Muslims would not want to slaughter them.
This is similar to the viewpoint of Nazi apologists of the Holocaust.
They maintain that if the Jews had not tried to control the world, Hitler would not have had to kill them.
The misappropriation of the legacy of Anne Frank is an example of the new left-wing form of antisemitism.
They maintain that if the Jews had not tried to control the world, Hitler would not have had to kill them.
The misappropriation of the legacy of Anne Frank is an example of the new left-wing form of antisemitism.
There are
some variations on the position of live Jews in the misappropriation.
When
fascists attack Jews, the Jews are victims.
When Muslims
attack Jews, the Muslims are the oppressed rising up against the oppressors,
the Jews.
Is there
no Anne Frank left just for us live Jews?
Yes there
is, the Anne Frank after the diary, in Bergen-Belsen; covered in lice, cold, starving, little more
than a skeleton and dying from typhus.
No comments:
Post a Comment